Open Letter to Time Warner regarding Piers Morgan and Unconstitutional Gun Laws and the True Purpose of the 2nd Amendment



Mr. Jeff Bewkes

Chairman of the Board and CEO

Time Warner Inc. (Owner of brands CNN & Piers Morgan)
One Time Warner Center
New York
, NY 10019-8016


Dear Mr Bewkes:

I watched the Piers Morgan show on December 14, 2012 regarding the shootings at the Sandy Hook Kindergarten – 4th Grade school earlier that day. My big question is why does CNN have a non-American citizen doing news about the United States? Piers Morgan can only be said to be happy as a Lark with these shootings so he could continue his rants about “gun control.” The mission of Piers Morgan in America is to disarm the citizens of the United States. Is that the mission of CNN and Time Warner? Piers Morgan is a British idiot and does not know the fundamental liberties established in our US Constitution. He has had Michael Moore on his show at least twice to promote the disarming of citizens of the United States. What is their purpose in disarming the people of the United States? Why would anyone want to do that?

Morgan had two mental health experts on his show and both cautioned Piers not to jump to conclusions about the mental condition of the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza. The focus of the two mental health experts was on the mental health in the nation, not on gun control, but that is all Piers could think of the whole hour was how to turn the conversation and extract a call for a gun ban from these two experts.

Piers actually went into a fit of rage about the .223 Bushmaster semi-automatic rifle that was found “outside the school on the property” that was “believed to belong” to the alleged gunman. There was no report that the gunman even used the Bushmaster in the two classrooms. It was reported that the gunman had used two pistols, a Glock and a Sig Sauer. It is strange how the rifle would get outside if the gunman killed himself in the building as reported.

Then Piers had four other guests on his show, two against the Second Amendment and law of the land and two in support of the law of the land. Democratic Representative Jerrald Nadler of New York and Dan Gross both wanted to see all “assault weapons” banned in America and the Second Amendment repealed. While John Lott Jr., author of More Guns, Less Crime and Steve Dulan, Board Member of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners both wanted the Second Amendment enforced and obeyed by the government.

Piers went into another fit of rage with Mr. Lott after Lott made the point that all these recent mass shooting occurred in areas of the nation that already have gun bans in place. Lott said that the gunman at the Aurora Theater shooting went out of his way to go to the premier showing of Batman where there was, in fact, a gun ban. Dan Gross quickly said; “that is pure bunk!” Lott challenged Gross about that fact and Gross had to concede that Lott was correct about the gun bans in those locations. But that did not deter maniacal Brit Piers from going into another fit of rage against guns and the law of the land. Then he bragged that the UK does not have all these shootings and they have gun control. Well then, why doesn’t he get his little “lobster back, red coat,” back on over there!

Then Nadler showed his ignorance of the law by saying that; “no one can responsibly object to a law restricting military fire arms from the public, doing background checks on everybody that buys a gun, and making sure that the mentally ill do not acquire fire arms.” or words to that effect. Then both Nadler and Piers said that these laws would not infringe upon the Second Amendment or deny a person their right of self-defense. Piers asked what the hunters needed with these kinds of military weapons. This is pure foreign ignorance! We should expect that from the British foreigner but not from a Representative of New York. However, we should not have to tolerate CNN an American Company using a foreigner to tell us we should disarm the population!

The Second Amendment is not to guarantee that men can put deer meat on the table. The whole use and sole purpose of the Second Amendment is to protect the civilian population from the abuses of the federal government. And this was stated clearly in the Preamble to the first ten amendments or Bill of Rights: “THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.” I don’t hunt but it is my right to have sufficient fire power to protect me and my family from government tyranny and to defend my neighbors as well. And now it has been reported that Nancy Lanza was working for DHS and DARPA in their use of video games in mind control experiments.

And since government tyranny is clearly on the rise and over 3,700 FEMA camps have been built all over the nation, it is not in the best interest of citizens to give up the largest and most powerful firearms they have. And, in fact, the civilian population was to possess everything that the federal army would have in war, according to Alexander Hamilton in his Federalist Letter # 29: “By thus circumscribing the plan, it will be possible to have an excellent body of well-trained militia, ready to take the field whenever the defense of the State shall require it. This will not only lessen the call for military establishments, but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.” And we have had an unlawful standing federal army for over 60 years conducting undeclared wars. This army threatens the lives, liberties and possessions of the people of the United States. And if Piers Morgan doesn’t like American liberty he can go to hell or back to England where he can lick the boots of his Prince.

How would it harm America to see a show on CNN about what the real purpose of the Second Amendment is?




Ron Avery


Ron Avery is a semi-retired architect, author and speaker on topics regarding Christian theology and the principles of property that regulate every aspect of lawful government. Reply to: